50 prvih poljubaca online dating
“Various procedures—regardless of whether we’re talking about debate formats or law—have the ability to hide the subjective experiences that shape these seemingly ‘objective’ and ‘rational’ rules,” said UC Hastings Law School professor Osagie Obasogie, who teaches critical race theory.“This is the power of racial subordination: making the viewpoint of the dominant group seem like the only true reality.” So, this is what’s happening.Ah well, it doesn’t matter anyway, as White people care more about the emotions of black people than anything else, ever, so you cannot lose a national championship simply because you did not discuss the topic of the debate.In the final round, Ruffin and Johnson squared off against Rashid Campbell and George Lee from the University of Oklahoma, two highly accomplished African-American debaters with distinctive dreadlocks and dashikis.Over four hours, the two teams engaged in a heated discussion of concepts like “nigga authenticity” and performed hip-hop and spoken-word poetry in the traditional timed format. His partner Campbell, who won the top speaker award at the National Debate Tournament two weeks later, had been unfairly targeted by the police at the debate venue just days before, and cited this personal trauma as evidence for his case against the government’s treatment of poor African-Americans. In the 2013 championship, two men from Emporia State University, Ryan Walsh and Elijah Smith, employed a similar style and became the first African-Americans to win two national debate tournaments.At one point during Lee’s rebuttal, the clock ran out but he refused to yield the floor. Wait, so it was two black teams arguing about how badly black people are treated when they were supposed to be debating presidential war powers? Many of their arguments, based on personal memoir and rap music, completely ignored the stated resolution, and instead asserted that the framework of collegiate debate has historically privileged straight, white, middle-class students. Debate tournaments now exist exclusively for the purpose of soothing the feelings of blacks, the original purpose having been thrown out completely.Mada se ne radi o Africi, ovaj primjer savršeno opisuje pojam kolektivna ili društvena dinamika između bijelaca i crnaca: College Debate Forums Brought Down to Primitive Levels by Blacks | Daily Stormer The integration of the races is about destroying White exceptionalism and dragging us down to the level of pre-civilized savages.
From the Atlantic: n March 24, 2014 at the Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) Championships at Indiana University, two Towson University students, Ameena Ruffin and Korey Johnson, became the first African-American women to win a national college debate tournament, for which the resolution asked whether the U. The more pressing issue, they argued, is how the U. Does complaining about your hurt feelings as a black person really “attack the premise” of whether or not the President should have unlimited war powers?Joe Leeson Schatz, Director of Speech and Debate at Binghamton University, is encouraged by the changes in debate style and community.“Finally, there’s a recognition in the academic space that the way argument has taken place in the past privileges certain types of people over others,” he said.In order to accommodate low-IQ minorities, the academic sphere is throwing out any and all standards of procedure, making it possible for illiterates to succeed.The Atlantic spells this out for you in no uncertain terms, simply adding the spin of “oh no, don’t worry, this is good.” Here is one of the debates with these blacks.